If you've ever wandered through a city, you may have seen tiny cell towers for 5G on street light poles. They appear like tiny boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.
They are replacing the larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're less noticeable, they still can cause problems for people.
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe distance that a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on scientific data that show that RF energy can be harmful to human health.
The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. It's typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram spread over a kilogram of tissue.
Since http://floodfoot7.jigsy.com/entries/general/How-long-Away-Can-One-particular-Be-From-some-sort-of-5G-Mobile-Tower-system-Before-Becoming-Harmful is able to transmit at higher frequencies and has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. This can lead to a wide range of possible harms, like the appearance of skin conditions such as dermatitis and skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the potential for harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 measured on 1cm2, and never exceeding 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the maximum SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever used a mobile phone, you're probably aware that the safest location from the tower is at least 400 meters. This is due to the power of transmission from the cell tower is significantly increased the further away the tower is.
Although this may sound like an ideal idea, the reality is that those living close to towers may actually be more vulnerable to health problems. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that residents who lived within 50m from cell towers suffered significant more health issues than those who lived farther away from the antennas.
But, the study revealed that those who relocated into areas farther away from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Another study has shown that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can lead to cancer, brain tumors, and other health problems.
This is because RF radiation, which is utilized for wireless communication, has the ability to be absorbed by the body's outer layer, which is the skin. This is important to understand since the skin serves as a protective barrier against mechanical injury, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and entry of toxic substances. It is also the biggest organ of the human body. safe distance from cell tower is accountable for protecting other organs.
Learn here depend on a variety of assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. They include the false belief that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
The assumption is also ignoring the deeper penetration of the ELF parts of modulated RF signals as well as the effect of short bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These theories are not compatible with current knowledge of the biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore they should not be considered for health protection exposure standards.
Additionally to that, ICNIRP and FCC limit their radiation limits for local peak SARs based on the maximum frequency of absorption (psSAR) that is an inadequate dosimetric tool to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for RF radiation that is exposed to other agents of the environment such like sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation and other environmental agents may produce synergistic or antagonistic effects. This could result in the risk of having adverse health effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can increase the risk of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin diseases such as acne.