If you've ever been through a city you might have noticed tiny mini 5G cell towers on street light poles. They look like little boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your mobile.
They are replacing larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're less noticeable but they can still cause issues for users.
The of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the maximum amount of time a person can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower for exposure are based upon scientific research that prove that electromagnetic energy can cause harm to health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy absorbed by tissue. It is typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, calculated over one gram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies this could be able to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. This could result in a wide range of potential harms, including exacerbated development of skin diseases like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Because of the potentially harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to set a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 measured over 1 cm2, and never exceeding 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the highest SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
what is a safe distance from a cell tower for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever used a mobile phone, you're probably aware that a safe location from the tower is around 400 meters. This is due to the power of transmission from the cell tower is significantly increased the farther your location from the tower.
Although this may sound like an ideal idea but the truth is that people living in close proximity to towers might be more prone to health problems. For example, a study from 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significantly more health complaints than those who lived farther far from antennas.
This study found that people who moved to areas that were further from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a few days. Another study has shown that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can lead to cancer, brain tumors as well as other health issues.
This is because RF radiation, which is used in wireless communication, can penetrate the body's outer layer of skin. This is important to understand since the skin serves as a barrier to protect against mechanical injury, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as entry of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the most important organ in the human body, and is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on several assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. They include the false belief that exposures to RF radiation are safe due to the limited radiation penetration in the human body (i.e., tissue heating).
The assumption also ignores the deeper penetration of the ELF parts of modulated RF signals, as well as the effects of short bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions do not correspond with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure guidelines.
Furthermore to that, ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their radiation limits for local peak SARs that are based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a sufficient dosimetric tool to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for https://notes.io/qNxAs with co-exposure to other environmental agents such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation and other agents in the environment could cause synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This could result in an increased risk of adverse health adverse effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.