If you've ever wandered through a city, you may have seen tiny mini 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They appear like tiny boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.
The smaller ones are being replaced by larger built cell towers. Although they're not as visible however, they could cause problems for people.
It is the Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the maximum amount of time a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on scientific data which show that the energy of RF can be harmful to health.
safe distance to live from cell phone tower of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the amount of radiofrequency energy taken up by tissues. It's typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram averaged over one gram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies, it has the potential to create more energy on the skin and other exposed body parts. This could result in many possible harms, such as an increase in formation of skin disorders such as dermatitis, cataracts and skin cancer.
Due to the possible severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general maximum power density of four mW/cm2 based on the average across 1 centimeter, but not to exceed 30 minutes, for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the highest spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever operated a cell phone, then you're aware that the safest distance from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is due to the power of the transmission of the cell tower is significantly increased the farther you are from it.
Although this may sound like an ideal idea, the reality is that those living close to towers might be more vulnerable to health issues. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50m from cell towers suffered significantly more health complaints than those living further far from antennas.
But, the study revealed that those who relocated into areas farther away from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Other studies have shown that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can lead to cancer, brain tumors and other health issues.
This is because RF radiation, which is utilized in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's outer layer of skin. safe distance to live from cell phone tower is vital to be aware of this because the skin acts as a shield against mechanical injury, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and the entry of harmful substances. The skin is the most important organ in the human body, and is responsible for keeping the integrity of the other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on a variety of assumptions that are not supported by evidence from science. This includes the false assumption that exposures to RF radiation are safe due to minimal penetration into the body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
The assumption is also ignoring the more extensive penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals, as well as the effects of brief bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These theories are not compatible with current knowledge of the biological effects of RF radiation. As such they shouldn't be relied upon for health-protection exposure guidelines.
Furthermore, the ICNIRP and FCC restrict their maximum radiation limits for local peak SARs, based on the peak speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) that is an inadequate dosimetric tool to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. In particular the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents may result in antagonistic or synergistic impacts. This would result in the risk of having adverse health effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could raise the chance of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.