If you've ever walked through a town you might have noticed tiny cell towers for 5G on street light poles. They appear like tiny boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from mobile providers to your mobile.
what is a safe distance from a cell tower are replacing the larger built cell towers. Although they're not as visible however, they could create problems for those who live nearby.
A FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe limit at which one can expose to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower of exposure are based upon scientific research which prove that electromagnetic energy could cause harm to health.
The absorption rate specific (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy taken up by tissues. It's usually 1.6 Watts per kilogram spread over a Gram of tissue.
However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies and has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin as well as other body parts. This can lead to various possible harms, such as an increase in development of skin diseases like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Because of the potentially harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 averaged over 1 cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the maximum spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
Have you ever used a mobile phone, you probably know that a safe range from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is due to the transmitting power of cell towers increases drastically the farther your location from the tower.
While this sounds like a good idea however, those living close to towers might be more prone to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India found that residents living within 50 meters of cell towers had much more health problems than those who lived farther away from the antennas.
This study showed that residents who moved to areas further away from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Studies have also revealed that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancer, and other health problems.
This is because RF radiation, which is used in wireless communication, can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, the skin. It is crucial to know because the skin serves as a barrier to protect against mechanical injury, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as infiltration of toxic substances. It is also the largest organ of the human body. safe distance to live from cell phone tower is responsible for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on various assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. They include the incorrect assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiations are not harmful due to the limited absorption into body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
The assumption also ignores the greater penetration of ELF parts of the modulated RF signal as well as the consequences on the body of short bursts generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions are not in line with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation. As such, they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure guidelines.
In addition, the ICNIRP and FCC limit its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs, based on the peak speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) that is an inadequate dosimetric tool to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiations with different environmental agents could cause synergistic or antagonistic effects. This can lead to an increased risk of adverse health adverse effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.