If you've ever wandered through a town, you may have seen tiny cell towers for 5G placed on poles for street lighting. They appear like tiny boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.
These smaller towers are replacing the larger built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable, they still can create problems for those who live nearby.
A of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe distance that a person can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based upon scientific research that prove that electromagnetic energy could be harmful to human health.
safe distance to live from cell phone tower (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. It's usually 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram spread over a kilogram of tissue.
But, since safe distance to live from cell phone tower operates at higher frequencies this could be able to create more energy on the skin as well as other body areas. This could result in various potential harms, including exacerbated appearance of skin conditions such as dermatitis, cataracts, and skin cancer.
Because of the potentially severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized maximum power density of four mW/cm2 measured across 1 centimeter, but not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the maximum SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever used a mobile phone, then you're aware that a safe range from the tower is around 400 meters. This is due to the power of transmission from a cell tower increases dramatically the farther the tower is.
While this sounds like a good idea however, people who live close to towers might be more susceptible to health issues. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that residents living within 50 meters of cell towers experienced much more health problems than those who lived farther distance from them.
But, the study revealed that those who relocated to areas further away from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Studies have also demonstrated that exposure to extreme amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancers as well as other health issues.
This is due to the fact that RF radiation, used in wireless communication, can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, which is the skin. It is crucial to know since the skin functions as a shield against injury to the body, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and infiltration of toxic substances. It is also the most important organ of the human body and is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds depend on numerous assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. This includes the false assumption that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe due to minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
safe distance from cell tower is also ignoring the deeper penetration of the ELF elements of modulated radio signals, as well as the effects of short bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These theories are not compatible with current knowledge of the biological effects of RF radiation. As such, they should not be considered for health protection exposure standards.
In addition there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC restrict their radiation limits for local peak SARs, based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR) which is not a sufficient dosimetric tool to assess the amount of radiation exposure. In particular it is inconclusive for frequencies above 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents such like sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents may cause synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This could result in an increased risk of negative health adverse effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.