If you've ever walked through a city, you may have seen tiny 5G cell towers on street light poles. They look like little boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.
They are replacing larger, purpose-built cell towers. Although https://pastebin.pl/view/368deab2 're not as visible however, they could create problems for those who live nearby.
what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe limit at which a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits of exposure are based on scientific data which prove that electromagnetic energy could cause harm to health.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. It's usually 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram spread over a kilogram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies this could be able to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other exposed body areas. This can lead to a wide range of potential harms, including exacerbated the development of skin conditions like dermatitis, cancer of the skin and cataracts.
Due to the potential for severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 measured over 1 cm2, and not exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the highest SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever used a mobile phone, you're probably aware that the safest location from the tower is around 400 meters away. This is because the transmitting power of the cell tower is significantly increased the farther the tower is.
While it sounds like a good idea but the truth is that people living in close proximity to towers may actually be more susceptible to health issues. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that residents living within 50 meters from cell towers suffered significantly more health complaints than those who lived farther far from antennas.
But, the study found that people who moved to areas that were further from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Another study has demonstrated that exposure to extreme frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause cancer, brain tumors, and other health problems.
This is due to the fact that the RF radiation utilized in wireless communications, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, the skin. This is important to understand since the skin functions as a shield against injury to the body, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and infiltration of toxic substances. The skin is the largest organ of the human body. It is accountable for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on many assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. This includes the false assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation is safe due to minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
This assumption does not take into account the more extensive penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals, as well as the consequences on the body of short bursts generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions do not correspond with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation. As such they shouldn't be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.
Additionally there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC restrict their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR), which can be described as an inadequate dosimetric tool for determining the level of radiation exposure. In particular it is inconclusive when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents such as sunlight. safe distance to live from cell phone tower of RF radiation with other agents in the environment could cause synergistic or antagonistic effects. This can lead to an increased risk of negative health consequences. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could increase the risk of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.