If you've ever been through a town you might have noticed tiny cell towers for 5G on the poles of street lights. They look like little boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.
The smaller ones are being replaced by larger built cell towers. While they're less noticeable but they can still create problems for those who live nearby.
It is the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe distance that a person can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits of exposure are based upon scientific research that show that RF energy can cause harm to health.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It's usually 1.6 Watts per kilogram spread over a Gram of tissue.
However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies, it has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. This can result in various potential harms, including exacerbated appearance of skin disorders such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the potential for negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized maximum power density of four MW/cm2 averaged across 1 centimeter, and never to exceed 30 minutes, for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the peak spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower for Maximum Exposure
Have you ever used a mobile phone, you probably know that the safest range from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is because the power of the transmission of a cell tower increases dramatically the further the tower is.
While it sounds like an ideal idea, the reality is that those living close to towers might be more susceptible to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India discovered that people living within 50 meters of cell towers had significantly more health complaints than those who were away from the antennas.
However, this study also showed that residents who moved to areas that were further from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a few days. Other studies have demonstrated that exposure to extreme amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancer as well as other health issues.
This is because RF radiation, which is used in wireless communication can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, which is the skin. This is vital to be aware of because the skin serves as a barrier to protect against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections by pathogenic microorganisms, and entry of toxic substances. The skin is the largest organ of the human body and is responsible for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower on numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific research. These include the erroneous belief that exposures to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal absorption into body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
This assumption does not take into account the more extensive penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals as well as the effects on the body of short bursts generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions do not correspond with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore, they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.
Furthermore to that, ICNIRP and FCC restrict their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs that are based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) which is not a reliable dosimetric instrument to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. In safe distance from cell tower is inconclusive when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation with other agents in the environment could result in antagonistic or synergistic results. This can lead to an increased risk of adverse health effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may raise the chance of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.