If what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower 've ever been through a town you might have noticed tiny 5G cell towers on street light poles. They look like little boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cellular providers to your mobile.
They are replacing the larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're less noticeable, they still can cause issues for users.
It is the Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the maximum amount of time a person can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on scientific data that prove that electromagnetic energy could be harmful to human health.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It's typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram calculated over one kilogram of tissue.
But, since what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower operates at higher frequencies this could be able to create more energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body areas. This could lead to a wide range of potential harms, including exacerbated appearance of skin conditions like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the potential for harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to create a general maximum power density of four mW/cm2 based on the average over 1 cm2, and never exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the maximum spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever used a cell phone, you're probably aware that the safest distance from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is due to the power of the transmission of the cell tower is significantly increased the further the tower is.
While this sounds like an ideal idea, the reality is that people who live close to towers may actually be more susceptible to health issues. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India discovered that those who lived within 50m of cell towers experienced significant more health issues than those who lived farther far from antennas.
However, this study also showed that residents who moved into areas farther away from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Studies have also revealed that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancer and other health issues.
This is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is utilized for wireless communication, has the ability to be absorbed by the body's outer layer, the skin. what is a safe distance from a cell tower is important to understand since the skin functions as a protective barrier against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as infiltration of toxic substances. The skin is the largest organ in the human body and is responsible for keeping the integrity of the other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on numerous assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. These include the erroneous assumption that exposures to RF radiation are safe due to minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
The assumption also ignores the more extensive penetration of ELF parts of modulated RF signals, as well as the consequences of brief bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These theories are not compatible with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. As such, they should not be considered for health protection exposure guidelines.
In addition there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC restrict their exposure limits to local peak SARs that are based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a sufficient dosimetric tool to assess the amount of radiation exposure. Particularly it is inconclusive when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents such like sunlight. The interactions of RF radiations with different agents in the environment could cause synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This could result in an increased risk of negative health effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may raise the chance of developing skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin conditions like acne.